Bias in AI systems: where it comes from and how it is measured

Updated

Bias in AI systems stems from skewed training data, flawed algorithms, and human biases embedded during development. Measuring bias involves auditing data and predictions with statistical fairness criteria. Standards bodies provide frameworks for identifying and managing bias across the AI lifecycle.

Sources of bias

According to the NIST publication on identifying and managing bias, bias is pervasive across AI technology processes and can cause harm even when there is no intention to bias the system. NIST's standard on AI bias

The arXiv survey on bias and fairness lists various sources of bias, such as historical bias, representation bias, and measurement bias, which can affect AI applications. the arXiv survey on machine learning

Types of bias

IBM describes several common types of AI bias, including measurement bias, sample or selection bias, confirmation bias, and stereotyping bias, each of which can distort outputs and cause harm. IBM's article on AI bias

Other types include exclusion bias, when important data is left out, and recall bias, which occurs during data labeling when labels are inconsistently applied. These biases often interact and compound each other.

Measuring bias

Google's fairness module advises that before putting a model into production, it is critical to audit training data and evaluate predictions for bias. Google's fairness module

The Gender Shades study measured error rates in commercial gender classification systems and found that darker-skinned females were misclassified with error rates up to 34.7%, while lighter-skinned males had a maximum error rate of 0.8%. the Gender Shades study

Standards and governance

The textbook Fairness and Machine Learning discusses how United States anti-discrimination law applies to automated decision making and how discrimination tests can be applied to algorithmic systems. the FairMLBook

Organizations can adopt governance policies that direct, manage, and monitor AI activities to ensure responsible development and use, balancing benefits for businesses, customers, and employees.

Error rates in commercial gender classificationDarker-skinned females: 34.7 % error rate; Lighter-skinned males: 0.8 % error rateError rates in commercial genderclassificationDarker-skinned females34.7 % error rateLighter-skinned males0.8 % error rate
Figures from PMLR
Common types of bias in machine learning
Bias typeDescriptionExample
Measurement biasIncomplete data fails to include the whole populationA college model for graduation includes only graduates, missing dropouts
Sample or selection biasTraining data is not representative or large enoughAll school teachers consulted have the same qualifications, so model requires identical qualifications
Confirmation biasModel relies too much on pre-existing beliefsA hiring model favors candidates similar to past hires
Stereotyping biasSystem reinforces harmful stereotypesA translation system associates genders with certain professions

Frequently asked questions

What causes bias in AI systems?

Bias can come from skewed training data, biased algorithms, or human biases embedded during development, such as measurement bias or sample bias.

How is AI bias measured?

AI bias is measured by auditing training data and evaluating model predictions across demographic groups using fairness metrics like demographic parity or equalized odds.

What is an example of AI bias?

The Gender Shades study found that commercial facial analysis systems misclassified darker-skinned women at rates up to 34.7%, while lighter-skinned men had error rates below 1%.

Are there standards for managing AI bias?

NIST has published a special publication titled Towards a Standard for Identifying and Managing Bias in Artificial Intelligence, which addresses bias across the AI lifecycle.